Learn What We Have Accomplished for Other Accident Victims in Louisiana
You may be looking for information about a car accident, truck accident, industrial accident, or workers’ compensation claim in Southwest Louisiana. You’ve come to the right place. This Lake Charles, Louisiana accident attorney invites you to review these results in consideration of contacting us to help you in your claim.
Of course you know this next part, but I am obligated to tell you that the outcome of each case depends on the facts, circumstances, and law applicable to that case. By providing results obtained by Marceaux Law Firm, we are not making a guarantee or promise about the value or potential outcome of any other cases, claims, or lawsuits.
DISCLAIMER: The results are specific to the facts and legal circumstances of each of the clients' cases and should not be used to form an expectation that the same results could be obtained for other clients in similar matters without reference to the specific factual and legal circumstances of each client's case.
Auto Accidents
- Client’s vehicle rear ended suffers back injury
- Client suffered back injury Client’s vehicle rear ended
- Client’s vehicle rear ended Client suffered back injury
- Client’s vehicle rear ended Client suffered torn rotator cuff
- Client able to return to gainful employment shortly after the shooting accident
- Client’s young son dies in automobile accident
- Client struck by garage door
- Client made left turn in front of approaching oncoming vehicle
- Client’s vehicle rear ended Client suffers back injury
- Seventy year old client handcuffed by casino
- Client’s vehicle rear ended on I-10
- Client with previous back injury undergoes functional capacity evaluation
- Client’s vehicle rear ended
- Client’s vehicle was rear ended
- Client was a pedestrian walking along road
- Minor driving second vehicle caused the accident
- Client dies following exposure to petrochemicals
- Client’s vehicle rear ended on highway
- Client involved in an accident on a rural highway
- Client walking on sidewalk trips and falls
- Client proceeding on rural highway
- Client travels through traffic signal
- Client is a young child secured in car seat
- Client on I-210 travels through a construction zone
- Client's vehicle rear ended by concrete pump truck
- Client exposed to toxic chemical resulting in lung damage
- Multiple clients exposed to toxic chemicals
Awarded: $100,000
Awarded: $100,000
Awarded: $100,000
Awarded: $120,000
Awarded: $120,000
Awarded: $125,000
Awarded: $125,000
Awarded: $125,000
Awarded: $140,000
Awarded: $155,000
Awarded: $175,000
Awarded: $200,000
Awarded: $220,000
Awarded: $225,000
Awarded: $250,000
Awarded: $335,496
Awarded: $343,387
Awarded: $354,000
Awarded: $367,000
Awarded: $440,000
Awarded: $500,000
Awarded: $550,000
Awarded: $906,250
Awarded: $1,300,000
Awarded: $ 2,691,528
Awarded: $ 4,500,000
Awarded: $45,000,000
Workers’ Compensation
- Employer contending the client was intoxicated on the job
- Employer contending that client was not disabled in work accident
- Employer contending that the client was intoxicated
- Employer contending that the clients foot infection was not caused by work conditions
- Benefits denied for weight loss surgery that was needed before client could undergo back surgery
- Employer contending that the client did not suffer an on-the-job accident
- Employer denied claim contending that the client did not suffer a disabling injury
- Employer asserting that the client did not suffer an on-the-job accident
- Employer contending that the client suffered from a pre-existing condition
- Employer alleging that the client was not its employee
- Employer alleging the client intentionally injured himself
- The employer failed to pay all medical bills of the injured client
- Employer denied contending that client was not disabled from working
- Employer contending that client's fibromyalgia was not caused by his work accident
- Employer contending that client was not disabled from working
- Employer contending that the client did not suffer a disabling injury
- Employer contending that the client was capable of working and earning the same wages
- Employer contending the client was subject to out-of-state workers’ compensation benefits
- Denied the workers compensation claim contending the client did not suffer a disabling injury
- Employer did not have workers’ compensation insurance
Awarded: $90,000
Awarded: $100,000
Awarded: $104,000
Awarded: $110,000
Awarded: $120,000
Awarded: $120,273
Awarded: $125,000
Awarded: $290,000
Miscellaneous
- Client trips and falls on raised portion of sidewalk
- Clients disability insurance claim denied
- Legal malpractice claim for failure of former lawyer to file suit on behalf of client
- Insurance company denied claim contending husband did not die accidentally
Awarded: $169,000
Awarded: $226,105
Awarded: $445,000
Awarded: $514,000